Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters

Database
Language
Document Type
Year range
1.
biorxiv; 2022.
Preprint in English | bioRxiv | ID: ppzbmed-10.1101.2022.12.20.521197

ABSTRACT

Recombination is the main contributor to RNA virus evolution, and SARS-CoV-2 during the pandemic produced several recombinants. The most recent SARS-CoV-2 recombinant is the lineage labeled XBB, also known as Gryphon, which arose from BJ.1 and BM.1.1.1. Here we performed a genome-based survey aimed to compare the new recombinant with its parental lineages that never became dominant. Genetic analyses indicated that the recombinant XBB and its first descendant XBB.1 show an evolutionary condition typical of an evolutionary blind background with no further epidemiologically relevant descendant. Genetic variability and expansion capabilities are slightly higher than parental lineages. Bayesian Skyline Plot indicates that XBB reached its plateau around October 6, 2022 and after an initial rapid growth the viral population size did not further expand, and around November 10, 2022 its levels of genetic variability decreased. Simultaneously with the reduction of the XBB population size, an increase of the genetic variability of its first sub-lineage XBB.1 occurred, that in turn reached the plateau around November 9, 2022 showing a kind of vicariance with its direct progenitors. Structure analysis indicates that the affinity for ACE2 surface in XBB/XBB.1 RBDs is weaker than for BA.2 RBD. In conclusion, nowadays XBB and XBB.1 do not show evidence about a particular danger or high expansion capability. Genome-based monitoring must continue uninterrupted in order to individuate if further mutations can make XBB more dangerous or generate new subvariants with different expansion capability.

2.
biorxiv; 2022.
Preprint in English | bioRxiv | ID: ppzbmed-10.1101.2022.11.11.516052

ABSTRACT

The BQ.1 SARS-CoV-2 variant, also known as Cerberus, is one of the most recent Omicron descendant lineages. Compared to its direct progenitor BA.5, BQ.1 carries out some additional spike mutations in some key antigenic site which confer it further immune escape ability over other circulating lineage. In such a context, here we performed a genome-based survey aimed to obtain an as complete as possible nuance of this rapidly evolving Omicron subvariant. Genetic data suggests that BQ.1 represents an evolutionary blind background, lacking of the rapid diversification which is typical of a dangerous lineage. Indeed, the evolutionary rate of BQ.1 is very similar to that of BA.5 (7.6 x 10-4 and 7 x 10-4 subs/site/year, respectively), which is circulating by several months. Bayesian Skyline Plot reconstruction, indicates low level of genetic variability, suggesting that the peak has been reached around September 3, 2022. Structure analyses performed by comparing the properties of BQ.1 and BA.5 RBD indicated that the impact of the BQ.1 mutations on the affinity for ACE2 may be modest. Likewise, immunoinformatic analyses showed modest differences between the BQ.1 and the BA5 potential B-cells epitope. In conclusion, genetic and structural analysis on SARS-CoV-2 BQ.1 suggest that, it does not show evidence about its particular dangerous or high expansion capability. The monitoring genome-based must continue uninterrupted for a better understanding of its descendant and all other lineages.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL